23 April 2021

The Snyder Cut Doesn't Deserve All the Praise and Hype

Having recently finished watching the Snyder Cut of Justice League, I mentioned it and a friend of mine shared some compelling thoughts on the movie. When I asked him where he was planning on sharing them, he didn't want to put his name behind these comments and allow drama around him to ensue. So, I volunteered my site.


I cannot take any credit for the following - this is a much better articulation than anything I would have written. However, I really like what he wrote about developing characters and bringing them to the screen, as opposed to what Marvel did. I thought the village girl smelling Aquaman's sweater was super unnecessary. I also found the introduction of Martian Manhunter to be a strange introduction. And that post-apocalyptic was so bizarrely unnecessary and ruined the pacing of the film.

I will still say that it was an impressive movie and a massive improvement over Whedon's theatrical release, but these criticisms still stand.

Here are my friend's words:

I feel like everyone praising the Snyder Cut is like the Emperor's New Clothes. I don't know where DC's mistakes end and Snyder’s begin, but, for one thing, they rushed to make a Justice League movie way too soon. Marvel took their time and had a few hits before bringing all the (already established in previous movies) characters together in Avengers.

I believe that one of Snyder’s justifications for the length was that he had to introduce several characters. Well, then he shouldn't have done that. (Or maybe had to do that, if that was DC's fault.) Cyborg, Aquaman, and Flash should have had their standalone movies BEFORE Justice League. One of the few things I liked better about the Snyder Cut was that it gave us more of a Cyborg origin story. But that shouldn't have been shoved into the Justice League movie. The movie should have been a team origin story. Cyborg should have had his own movie first.

Giving Snyder the benefit of the doubt that DC forced him to rush things along and make Justice League sooner, I still don't think the length was justified. Off the top of my head, moments like that village singing to Aquaman as he leaves was useless, especially since he came back to the village a few scenes later. (As well as that woman randomly smelling his shirt, which was weird.) 

And Wonder Woman in that cavern that recounts the history of Darkseid's previous invasion was useless. She ends up sharing all of that with Bruce Wayne. In Whedon's version, where they just show her recounting the story to Bruce Wayne, I simply assumed it was part of the history she was taught while growing up. (“Hey mom. What’s that random building on the far side of the island I’m growing up on all about?” “Oh, that’s where we keep the motherbox. It’s actually an important part of our history so I should probably tell you about that.”) So that whole cavern scene in the Snyder Cut just made a way-too long movie longer than it should have been. 

Plus, all the slow motion, including Flash reversing time. Too much extra stuff. Those are just some examples of scenes I felt made an already too long movie unnecessarily longer.

In a way, Snyder also had a perfect storm that Joss Whedon didn't. Snyder had an extra few years to brainstorm, no set (theatrical) release date, and didn't have to worry about people sitting through a 4+ hour movie in one sitting in the theaters. So I'm very skeptical this was 100% his original vision for the theatrical release.

Snyder also completely destroyed what an epic villain Darkseid is. He's the Thanos of the DC universe. But he put Darkseid in the flashback battle, instead of Steppenwolf like Whedon did. So our intro to Darkseid is him getting his butt kicked within a few minutes of his introduction, and fleeing Earth in shame. I can't take him as seriously as Thanos after a brief scene like that. Marvel spent years slowly building up Thanos. The first time we see Thanos is at the end of the first Avengers, and all we get is a sinister smile in the post-credits scene. And by the time he's fully introduced and fleshed out, he totally stole the show in Infinity War. He was the real star of that movie. We've already gotten Darkseid's intro and humiliating defeat. So Whedon did right by replacing Steppenwolf in that flashback scene. Which also made more sense of Steppenwolf’s exile.

Another thing that made the Snyder Cut too long was that post-apocalyptic future scene towards the end. Furthermore, the placement of that was horrible; it ruined the pacing. Immediately before that, we had a proper, "And they lived happily ever after (for the time being)" moment, and then Snyder shoves in that really long, dark scene. If anything, it should have been earlier in the movie.

He also introduces Martian Manhunter. And, apparently, he might have had plans to include the modern Green Lantern as well (not the one that dies in the flashback). Yet, he supposedly complained that he had too many characters to introduce in one film. If it was so important to introduce Martian Manhunter, then the character could have tagged along in another pre- or post-Justice League movie, like the introductions of Black Widow (Iron Man 2), Hawkeye (Thor) and Falcon (Captain America Winter Soldier).

There was also too much of Lois Lane mourning Clark's death. I liked how it was sort of a twist in the Whedon version when she showed up for the first time as Batman's secret weapon to help Clark get his senses back.

People are now saying "Bring back the Snyderverse." And I'm wondering - do they not remember how he only did an okay job with Man of Steel, and Batman vs. Superman was really panned? (People endlessly mocked the ridiculousness of the whole, "Save Martha!" line after that latter movie came out.) Batman spent most of that movie trying to kill Superman and, in Justice League, it's like Snyder completely ignored that fact and made it like Batman really missed and wanted to bring his BFF back to life.

At the end of the day, I had fun watching it. And, like I said above, there were some things I thought were an improvement, such as fleshing out Cyborg more and how they brought Superman back to life was explained better and, therefore, made more sense. I am also happy for Snyder that he got his shot at this, especially given the circumstances under which he had to leave the last version. But everything else I wrote above makes me feel like it doesn’t deserve all the praise and hype it’s getting.

22 April 2021

Podcast Appearance Discussing the 5th Episode of Falcon and Winter Soldier

Having previously discussed the 5th episode of WandaVision on the True Believers Marvel MCU Podcast, I returned to discuss the 5th episode of The Falcon and The Winter Soldier on the podcast’s 12th episode. We also squeezed in a discussion on the teaser trailer for Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings:

21 April 2021

Creating MCU Maven, My MCU Fansite

The other night after having recorded a second podcast appearance on an MCU podcast (having appeared a first time),  I got caught up in a deliberation: should I continue posting the videos and other related content simply simply to my own personal social media channels (e.g. this site and my personal YouTube channel) or should I create a separate MCU stream of social media and other things? 

So I began channeling Gary Vaynerchuk's advice of "Just do both", so that's what I decided. I will continue posting the stuff on my own personal social media, but also I decided to create MCU Maven, with a website on Sunday evening. This also includes an Instagram account, a Facebook page, and a YouTube channel. I have no intention of creating a separate Twitter account for MCU Maven, opting to stick with my personal account for sharing MCU content. 

For the time being, I am planning on largely focussing on video content that I am publishing, including my podcast appearances, as well as my quick episode highlights. Another area concerns trailers, as I did for Falcon and Winter Soldier

While I don't have necessarily any further plans for MCU Maven, I am excited to play around with this new experiment as a dedicated place to share my content that I'm putting out and to share with other fans. 

If people have suggestions or content they would like to see, I am very open to suggestions.

19 April 2021

Discussing Falcon and Winter Soldier Episode 5 on MCU Podcast [Video Clips]

Having previously appeared on the Fandom Podcast Network's True Believers Marvel MCU Podcast, I returned as a guest for the 12th episode of the show, this time discussing the 5th episode of Falcon and Winter Soldier. Stay tuned for the release of the podcast episode this week.

In the meantime, here are a few video clips from the episode:


12 April 2021

A Couple of Articles from the First Issue of Sources

This past Shabbat, I had read a couple of articles from the first issue of the Sources journal. Both of the articles I read were intriguing and insightful. 

 


"Is Jewish Continuity Sexist?"

The first of them was Mijal Bitton's "Is Jewish Continuity Sexist? On Jewish Values and Female Bodies". It was interesting and insightful to not only consider such a question, but also in dealing with the topic of how much had particular scholars' views on women necessarily shape the national Jewish discourse around Jewish continuity.

However, for an article that presumably seeks to not be sexist, yet it ignores men out of the picture of reproduction, which is remarkably befuddling. One wonders if there are people espousing endogamous marriages and sexual reproduction, why does this article only deal with one half of such relationships? She even makes a parenthetical comment about this glaring lacuna: "We have also ignored individual men and their desire for parenthood." It was fairly bizarre to me to miss out on half of the marriage and reproduction equation. Look, I get that Dr. Bitton was largely going for feminist perspectives, which is great, but why exclude men from these feminist perspectives? If, however, she meant gynocentric perspectives, I would understand, but she didn't specify that that was her intention in her article.

One paragraph to highlight is the following:

There simply is no intrinsic link between male actors in the field who behave badly and the validity of the arguments put forth in defense of the field of Jewish continuity. On the contrary, many women scholars have both advocated Jewish continuity and adopted a pro-natalist discourse. Based on a review of the scholarly literature, Sylvia Barack Fishman and Michelle Shain in a recent Contemporary Jewry article have argued that the claim animating this position—that “scholarly analysis of marriage and fertility reflects controlling male scrutiny”—is simply not supported by the evidence.

A key recommendation of hers is:

Jewish communal organizations should invest in children in ways that go beyond promoting childbirth by supporting working mothers and parents through policies in myriad areas, such as paid family leave, support for childcare, etc. Special attention should be given to feminist recommendations for the well-being of mothers in our society.


"What Happened to Jewish Pluralism?"

The other article I read was Yehuda Kurtzer's "What Happened to Jewish Pluralism?". It was quite insightful! I haven't yet mentioned Kurtzer yet in this space, although I have found him to be profoundly insightful over the years (for instance, check out these quotes of his that I have found to be of interest). Additionally,
an interesting discussion of this article may be found in this Facebook discussion by Rabbi Joshua Bolton.
 

The clear highlight for me from this essay was his pointing out about pluralistic attitudes and Talmudic study in the 1980s and 1990s, including this excerpt:

We can draw a straight line from this hermeneutical strategy to the widespread use of the Talmud in non-orthodox, non-normative Jewish educational settings: the emphasis on its ideological heterogeneity, the culture of debate, and the idea of the legitimacy of multiple viewpoints are all Talmudic ideas, but they are extrapolated to make a larger cultural argument about the Talmud. In turn, studying Talmud – and these selections of Talmud in particular – connects the (presumably) pluralistic ideas of the learner with the very activity in which they are engaged.

It's funny because even I have considered a cacophony of competing ideas as a way of describing the term "Talmudic". For instance, I was speaking with a yeshivish person about my Jewish drinking project and I described drinking in the Jewish tradition as something that is actually quite rabbinic/Talmudic, yielding a quizzical look. I had not realized that this notion of "Talmudic" standing in for containing multiple opinions derives from this since the last few decades.

I was also fascinated to learn that the same thing was happening in Talmudic studies in the academy in the 1970s and 1980s:

The late 1970s and 1980s saw massive growth in rabbinics scholarship in American Jewish studies, especially at the Mishnaic stratum, driven in no small part by the prolific output of Jacob Neusner and his training and placement of his students in university positions. (A Google ngram search shows a massive spike in the use of the word “Mishnah” between 1980-1990.) In “The Significance of Yavneh: Pharisees, Rabbis, and the End of Jewish Sectarianism,” an influential article about Yavneh and the formation of the rabbinic project, Shaye Cohen (then at the Jewish Theological Seminary, and now at Harvard) wrote that “the major contribution of Yavneh to Jewish history” was “the creation of a society which tolerates disputes without producing sects.” For the first time, Jews “agreed to disagree.” Other scholars contested Cohen’s chronology, but one thing is clear: this characteristic of rabbinic culture was being interrogated in the academy at the same time that an industry was growing around it in the Jewish community.

There is a lot more to unpack, but these were a couple of interesting pieces, to be sure.

07 April 2021

Morning Minute Musing Series: #41-#50

Having catalogued my Morning Minute Musing series episodes #0-#10, #11-#20, #21-#30, and #31-#40, here are episodes #41-#50:

#41: Pivoting with PPE at Work



#42: Uncertainty Today

 

#43: Being present for a mourner in-person while watching the Zoom graveside service of a spouse

 

#44: Coffee Meetings During a Pandemic

 

#45: Helping out residents with technology as a chaplain

 

#46: Attending a Funeral & a Burial

 

#47: Feeling a void after the passing of a resident

 

#48: Finally Tidying-Up YouTube Channels

 

#49: Not Relying on Editing for Videos

 

#50: No Longer New on the Job After 6 Months


 

        

01 April 2021

Morning Minute Musing Series: #31-#40

 Having catalogued my Morning Minute Musing series episodes #0-#10, #11-#20, and #21-#30, here are episodes #31-#40:

#31: Getting tested at work on an ongoing basis for COVID-19 is helpful


#32: Empathy has been hugely instrumental in my current job


#33: The protections for residents in senior living facilities has been taking a toll


#34: A Surprising Gender Preference


#35: Pivoting for the Holidays


#36: Some observations about Jewish video content on YouTube


#37: Beginning to see a lot more Jewish content on YouTube


#38: New PPE Requirements


#39: My Favorite Day of the Week: Tuesday

 

#40: The Excitement in My Life In Recent Days: Filmora X